generalship of Alexander the Great

série: Alexandre le Grand
éditeur: Da Capo
auteur: Fuller J.F.C.
classement: biblio2A
année: 1960
format: broché
état: TBE
valeur: 15 €
critère: ***
remarques: English book
the generalship of Alexander the Great

preface
- this study is based on sir William Tarn's book,
a great classical scholar of Alexander the Great
- unlike Julius Caesar, nothing has been
written within the 300 years
of Alexander's lifetime,
then we have the histories of:
- Diodorus Siculus, 100 BC
- Curtius Rufus, 150 AC
- Arrian (a reliable historian), 200 AC
which history is based on Ptolemy's
Ephemerides (official journal)
- Aristobulus, the geographer and one
of Alexander's leading technicians

this book is divided in two parts:
- the Record (= condensed history of
Alexander's career)
- the Analysis (= study of Alexander's
great battles

FIRST PART

A) the background

1/ decay of the city-states (polis)
- prominent cities: Sparta and Argos
(Peloponnese), Athens (Attic) and
Thebes (Beotia)
- comments on the citizenship, the civil
discord (stasis) and the army (mercenaries)
- various forms of government: aristocracy,
oligarchy, democracy and tyranny

2/ reforms of the philosophers,
extracts from:
- Plato's Republic and Laws
(= communistic tendencies)
- Xenophon's Anabasis
- Thucydides' Peloponnesian war

3/ Philip II of Macedon
- influenced by Epaminondas, a tactician of
genius and the first Greek general in history
to grasp the importance of concentrating
superiority of force against a selected point
in the enemy's front,
Epaminondas defeated the Spartan army by
using this tactic
- description of Philip's career and
character (practical, long-sighted
and unscrupulous using as well bribery
as military force)

4/ Amphipolis and the First Sacred war

first war:
- war between the Phocians
(supported by Athens and Sparta)
and the Thebans (supported by the Thessalians),
after the defeat of the Thessalians,
Philip established his control over Thessaly
second war:
- war again between the Thebans and Phocians,
defeated with the help of Philip
who in turn received the city of Amphipolis
and was honoured by the Amphictyonic Council

5/ Isocrates' Panhellenic programme
- suggestion to conquer Persia by uniting the
Greek cities into a "Hellas" state
(orations of Isocrates = Panegyricus,
speeches of Demosthenes = on the crown,
the Olynthiac, the Philippic)

6/ Byzantium and the Second Sacred war
- campaign of Philip in Thracia, decisive
battle of Chaeronea against Thebes and Athens

7/ congress of Corinth
- Philip called a new order on all the Greek
states, creation of a hellenic league
represented by a Synhedrion or Federal Council
- all the Hellenes in Greece
(except the Spartans) were united
into a single Greek federation (league)
of which Philip was the generalissimo (stratego)

B) the Macedonian army

1/ Greek warfare before Philip
- the first battles were engaged each other
in hand-to-hand combat
= display of personal valour, then came the
group fronting (the infantry with the hoplite),
the city-state army was born with
its main component:
the phalanx which was designed for one single
purpose:
to rupture the enemy's front

- however mobile operations were prohibited,
for that purpose the cavalry was engaged,
but the Athenian general Iphicrates invented
the light-armed troops (the peltasts)
which could replace, espc. in mountainous
country, the use of the cavalry

- then progress was also made in siegecraft
with catapults, movable siege towers
(wooden towers on wheels) and battering-rams
- two great forerunners for the development
of professional soldiers:
Dionysius I of Syracuse and
Jason of Pherae (370 BC)

2/ Philip's new model army
it consisted of
- mounted nobles (hetairoi or royal
companions of cavalry)
- royal hypaspists or foot guard
= force of infantry,
hereof the pezetairoi (foot companions)
formed the phalanx with the famous sarissa
- it was a professional army imbued with a
national spirit, contrary to the mercenaries,
however the Macedonian army was not a
maritime power


C/ Alexander

1/ youth and education
- born 356 BC, his birth was wrapped up
with legend,
from his father, Herakles was due to be his
ancestor and Achilles the same from his mother,
- we have some physical portraits from
Lysippus his sculptor, Apelles his painter
and Pyrgoteles his engraver,
Alexander was instructed in practically all
sciences incl. philosophy, medicine, botany,
geography, poetry, military, politics and sport

2/ genius and personality
- Alexander had an innate sense of royalty,
before conquering others, he could conquer himself,
royal behaviour again towards Sisygambis,
Darius and Porus
- he was completely wrapped up in his destiny
and devoted to his task
but he showed also compassion, espc. for his soldiers
- although he became great through fortune,
he became also worthy of his fortune (Plutarch)

3/ his misdeeds
- relatively few in comparison with the
facts, however:
a) unnecessary ruthlesness in waging war
(with Thebes, Tyr, Gaza, the Sogdians and the Malli)
but it was the methods of war at that time
b) personal crimes (mostly due from the same
root:
Macedonian opposition to Alexander's Persian policy)
- Parmenion (in some way a political
necessity)
- Cleitus (due to excessive drinking but he
repented as a king)
- Callisthenes
- the burning of Persepolis (somehow unclear
but probably for political reasons)

D/ the theatre of war

1/ the geography in 400 BC
- two continents: Europe and Asia
(up to India, Punjab),
this was about 2/3 the extent of the USA
inhabited by about 50 mio people

2/ organization of the Persian empire
- which was then the center of world history,
Darius I was not a conqueror but an empire
organizer and administrator,
he assured the rights and privileges of the
subdued people,
the empire was divided into satrapies,
additionnally to the provincial levies,
there was a standing army consisting of
2000 cavalry, 2000 infantry
and 10'000 called the "Immortals",
military roads were built, the western road
was known as the "royal road" from Sardes to Susa
(90 days for 1500 miles but 7 days for the
imperial couriers),
however the Persian army was mostly based on
quantity rather than quality

E/ strategical narrative
- when Philip died, Alexander's succession
was not unchallenged, but fortunately
Antipater and Parmenion remained loyal to Alexander,
also he was a genius, espc. when considering
his startling rapidity to act and react

1/ securing the home base
- by subdueing Thessaly, Thracia, Illyria and
Thebes as well as appointing Antipater
as regent of Macedonia

2/ establishing the overseas base
- democratic governments were installed in
the Ionian cities and Persian administration
was to remain, but Alexander separated civil
and military commands

3/ winning command of the sea
- securing the Mediterranean sea with the
conquest of the Phoenician cities, espc. Tyre

4/ securing the south-western frontier
- occupation of Egypt as a security in the
rear and as a food-providing province,

foundation of Alexandria, the largest city
among the 17 known Alexandrias founded by him

5/ winning political supremacy
- command of the economically important
cities of Babylon, Susa and Persepolis
where the total gold and silver treasures
seized, amounted to 180'000 talents
= about £ 44 mio (1930)

6/ securing the north-eastern frontier
- conquest of Bactria and Sogdiana

7/ search for the eastern frontier
- conquest of the Punjab (Porus and Taxiles)
= similarity with the British policy (divide
and rule), the quest for the ocean,
however Alexander did not succeed in
establishing his eastern frontier
and was stopped at the Hyphasis river
(near the Kashmir/Indian border)

8/ linking the empire by sea
- march through Gedrosia and Nearches' sea
expedition (Indica)

9/ imperial unification
- mass-marriage, suppression of the stasi
(factional discord among Greek cities),
deification of Alexander who had not been the
only one so far
(see Lysander the Lacedemonian as well as
Dionysius, Dion and Philip of Macedonia
by some of his subjects
- the deification was the justification for
the need of finding a legal basis
in a constitutional state for an extra-
constitutional authority)

SECOND PART

A) Alexander's great battles

1/ the Granicus
- the Persian troops were on that occasion
inferior in number to those of Alexander,
it was a battle of epic heroes (commanders
against commanders),
however strategical offensive of Alexander
by first starting with a faint attack,
then by a diagonal assault against the
Persian center

2/ Issus
- conventional battle in the usual
development, i.e.
main attack by Alexander's right wing
whereas the left stands and flank movement
towards the Persian center (Darius)
with the cavalry

3/ Arbela (Gaugamela)
- this time Darius's army was well
outnumbering the one of Alexander,
espc. with cavalry, but, if there was plenty
of mobility, there was little stability
in Darius' army

- tactical aim of battle by Alexander
a) defensive order in approaching the Persian army
b) offensive in oblique order to throw the
Persian line out of gear
and push forward with a strong right wing
c) charge through one or other of the gaps
into the enemy's front
- the whole based on following maxim:
the whole art of war consists in a well-
reasoned and extremely circumspect defensive
followed by rapid and audacious attack

4/ Hydaspes
- one of the most brilliant operations
in ancient warfare,
the difficulty was in the danger of the
elephants for the horses
(which were disturbed by the elephants)
- the turning force: Alexander
- the hidding force: Craterus


B/ Alexander's sieges

1/ Halicarnassus
- after some heavy sieges, the city was
stormed but the two citadels:
Salmacis and the king's castle surrendered
only 12 months later

2/ Tyre
- a formidable fortified city on a small island
with about 40'000 inhabitants,
on that occasion, Alexander reconstituted his fleet

3/ Gaza
- possibly the hardest siege and the most
remarkable one by Alexander
when considering the difficulty to build
a counter-mound with a huge ramp


C/ Alexander's small wars

1/ the Balkan and Illyrian campaigns
- these campaigns were also masterfully
executed and prevented the Celts
to invade Macedonia and Greece
for the next 50 years

2/ the Persepolis campaign (Persian Gates)
- mountain campaign against Ariobarzanes

3/ war in Bactria and Sogdiana
- tactics against the Scythians
- subduction of the Sogdian rock
and the rock of Chorienes

4/ the Swat campaign
- campaign against the Assacenians
- capture of the Aornus rock (= Pir-Sar)
being one of the most famous mountain
campaigns of Alexander

5/ the Mallian campaign



D/ Alexander's statesmanship

1/ as captain-general
- Alexander soon realized that generous
behaviour (policy of conciliation)
would achieve more than ruthlesness,
also he did not underestimate the important
strategical aim of security to protect his bases,
furthermore his political sense induced him
to get the affection of the civil population
(to win the inner front)

2/ as lord of Asia and reconciler of mankind
- according to Tarn, Alexander had no plan to
conquer Carthage and the western Mediterranea
(such as Rome and Sicily),
he would rather have concentrated in
consolidating and unifying his empire
and the only plan of conquest at the time of
his death were the Caspian and Arabian
sea regions
- Alexander and his doctrine (Alexander as
the first Christ?)



E/ Alexander's generalship

1/ as genius
- both Alexander and Napoleon were real
geniuses, two ways to lead an army:
by fear or by love (soldiers' affection),
but above all, it must be the spirit of
genius which is unknown to himself
and to the others (an original genius
does not know its own powers),
- genius is passion and not reason


2/ as strategist
(art of the general = strategos)
- strategy = operations in plan
= science or art of projecting
and directing military movements
= plan of war
- policy is the continuation of strategy,
the policy of Alexander was not to destroy
but to conquest

- three principal objects in carryng on war:
a) to conquer and destroy the enemy's armed forces
b) to get possession of the material elements
of agression and of the other sources of
existence (such as money) of the hostile army
c) to gain public opinion

- the five principal strategical principles:
a) employ all the forces which can be made
available with the utmost energy
b) concentrate force at the point where the
decisive blows are to be struck,
to run the risk even of being at a
disadvantage at other points
in order to make sure of the result at the
decisive point,
success at this point will compensate for all
defeats at secondary points
c) not to lose time (rapidity)
d) causing surprise
e) follow up the success with the utmost energy

n.b. however not leave the battle field in
pursueing fleeing enemies
to the disadvantage of the main battle

+ two outstanding strategical factors:
establishment of secure bases and protection
of communication lines


3/ as tactician
- it must be however considered that without
the army inherited from his father,
Alexander's conquests, despite his genius,
would have been inconceivable

tactics = operations in action
- the four primary tactical elements:
the aim or object, security, mobility
and offensive power
- three accentuating elements:
economy of force,
concentration of force and surprise
- great importance was given to the cavalry
as a psychological effect with the charge
- the art in war is to give blows without
receiving them

- Alexander's tactical operations

1/ principle of maintenance of the aim
(one must profit from one's success)
- Alexander subordinated strategical aim to
the political aim
and the tactical aim to the strategical i.e.
a) destroy the inner front (Thebes)
b) secure the Mediterranean sea (Tyre, Egypt)
c) occupy Babylon, Susa and Persepolis (treasure)

- usually in battles, the phalanx was the chest,
the left wing defensive and the right wing offensive
except at the battle of Hydaspis because the
cavalry could not fight against the elephants
- penetration was Alexander's tactical means,
when however determined to follow his aim,
he could of course change the course of
action according to the events

2/ principle of security
(defensive action followed by rapid attack)
- mobile wings (both defensive and/or offensive)
- reserves
- use of field artillery (catapults)


3/ principle of mobility
(velocity is the great element between
force and weight)
- speed dominated all Alexander's military actions


4/ principle of the offensive
(be the first to attack, the best defense
being the attack)
- the offensive knows what it wants whereas
the defensive is in a state of uncertainty,
Alexander always adapted his actions to novel
circumstances,
he never did copy his successes


5/ principle of economy and concentration of force
i.e. send the attack forces, squadron after
squadron or attacking without great losses
(security-bound)


6/ principle of surprise
(augmenting the chances in one's favour)
- it is the most effective element in
attaining superiority,
in ancient times, it was mostly the
responsability of the commanding general
whereas in modern times, responsabilities are
shared with the general staff


4/ as leader
- Alexander was the thinking and fighting
head of the army,
he did the same as did his soldiers,
he was an example both with his courage and
his invincibility
- Alexander loved his companions but always
dominated them


F/ Epilogue
- similarities with Alexander's art of war
in modern times,
i.e. Hitler's strategy (subvert your enemy
from within) and like Philip, he created
a new army based on mobility,
the beginning of Hitler's operations were
masterfully done
but afterwards the light died
- Hitler's failure was to deny the importance
of the various nationalities in Russia
and make alliances with these nations;
instead he intended to enslave them or
exterminate them
(he was a butcher instead of a liberator)
- contrary to Chamberlain, Churchill did
somehow the same
(war against Germany instead of supporting
the Anti-Nazis),
Staline was somehow better in line with
Alexander's policy
(establishing communist puppet governments)


>> a very good book, a must for the reader
of Alexander's biography
- besides, giving a good description of
Ancient Greek and Ancient warfare,
also being a good narrative about the
political background at that time,
it describes well the military operations of
Alexander (both strategical and tactical)
- the book is also a good guide line for
military study with plenty of maps
and sketches

couvertures:
Copyright 2008 - 2026 G. Rudolf